I have just read RMS’ “How the Swedish Pirate Party Platform Backfires on Free Software” http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/pirate-party.html and I’m still formulating my opinion on this but in general I am ABSOLUTELY against the way copyright is done currently. When Copyright was introduced to America it was a “Creators Monopoly” and only lasted 14 years. The originators thought that was more than ample time for you to create something, make back the money that it cost you in creation, and fund you next idea. I also think that is more than enough time.
No matter what DRM is evil and douchbaggary
More thoughts to come [as soon as I have them :)]
I really want to see @doctorow and @lessig weigh in on this 🙂
The OSI Board today approved the Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) and the Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL). The decision to approve was informed by the overwhelming (though not unanimous) consensus from the open source community that these licenses satisfied the 10 criteria of the Open Source definition, and should therefore be approved.
The formal evaluation of these licenses began in August and the discussion of these licenses was vigorous and thorough. The community raised questions that Microsoft (and others) answered; they raised issues that, when germane to the licenses in question, Microsoft addressed. Microsoft came to the OSI and submitted their licenses according to the published policies and procedures that dozens of other parties have followed over the years. Microsoft didn’t ask for special treatment, and didn’t receive any. In spite of recent negative interactions between Microsoft and the open source community, the spirit of the dialogue was constructive and we hope that carries forward to a constructive outcome as well.
The Open Source Initiative is best known as the steward of the Open Source Definition and for its license review process. But, an open source license is just the starting point. Open source depends upon code (which can be made better), community (which can be made larger), and ultimately a commitment to the idea that the more free the market is for innovation, the more innovation the market can deliver.
Every approval that OSI issues represents our community’s demand for more open-source code, a larger and more vital open-source community, and all the benefits open source brings to innovation in a free market. The new Ms-PL and Ms-RL are no exceptions.
From what I have read from these licenses they seem to be very forward thinking for Microsoft. I’m no sure how this will keep Steve “Monkey-Boy” Balmer from running his trap about Linux and other FOSS projects but maybe this can be a new era for Microsoft. I plan to keep microsuck.com in the bookmarks just in case though
threethirty’s posts to SKT are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Opensource.org site content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.